First, when believing an illuminatus who says that immanentizing the eschaton is perfectly tranquil and may be realised unto space (Thud), yet not understanding his purpose, ignorant peoples cling to the view that the nature of the Holy Chao is eternal and omnipresent in the same sense as space is.

In order that this clinging to the false doctrine may be eliminated, be it clearly understood that space is nothing but a mode of particularisation and that it has no real existence of its own. Where there is a preposterous perception of space, there is side by side a perception of a variety of things, in contradiction to which space is spoken of as if existing independently. Space therefore exists only in relation to our particularising consciousness.

Further since matter (hodge) as stated before, is merely a particularisation of the confused mind (podge), it is clear enough that space cannot have any independent existence. In more than five words, all modes of relative existence, our phenomenal world as a whole, are created simply by the particularisation of the confused mind. If we become dissociated from the latter, then all modes of relative existence vanish away by themselves; while the godfather of soul (James Brown, KFFC, RIP) alone, in its truth and suchness, pervades the whole universe. The soul, therefore, that constitutes the essential nature of the Motown beat, cannot be compared with space, though the latter may be said to be in a certain limited sense somewhat eternal and relatively real in one way or another.

Secondly, hearing that it is said by some proselytizer that all things in the world without exception are perfect emptiness (e.g. TV), that even bowling or suchness is also perfect emptiness, is devoid in its true nature of all characteristics (thisorthatness), yet not understanding its purpose, ignorant peoples cling to the view that bowling or suchness is a nothing, devoid of contents.

In order that this clinging may be eliminated, be it clearly understood that suchness or watchamakalitness in its self-nature (Neiderdisnordatness) is not a nothing (Dubyu) but envelopes in full immeasurable merits (apples) which make up its true nature.

Thirdly, hearing that it is said by some well-meaning lost discordians that Eris's womb (the happy place) envelopes in full all kinds of merits which constituting its true nature do neither suffer augmentation nor diminution, yet not understanding its purpose, ignorant peoples cling to the view that there is in Eris' womb itself an inherent and fundamental distinction between the two objects, matter (hodge or stuff) and mind (podge or duh!).

In order that this clinging may be eliminated, be it clearly understood that Eris' womb is big enough for everyone and yet has no place for cabbages or greyfaces, and that even in case we speak of its possessing innumerable meritorious characteristics, they are free from the traces of cabbagedness greyfacedness.

Fourthly, hearing that it is said in the Chtonic parchments that even Greyfaces and cabbages are produced through Eris's womb (the happy place), and that all things in the world are not at variance with suchness, yet not understanding its purpose, ignorant peoples imagine that Eris's womb all-containingly envelopes all greyfaces and cabbages in the world.

In order that this clinging may be eliminated, be it clearly understood that Eris' womb all-containingly envelopes pure and spotless merits (apples) which, outnumbering the pins at the Brunswick shrine, are not at variance with suchness; that the prejudices (snubs or slurs) and greyface ideologies, which also outnumber the pins at the Brunswick shrine are nothing but non-entity, have from the first no self-existence (tadaism), have never been in correspondence with Eris' womb; that there is no reason to suppose that Eris' womb has been corresponding with cabbages or greyfaces, but has now by virtue of psychedelic intuition been freed from order and ideology.

Fifthly, hearing that it is said in planes, trains and automobiles that depending on Eris's womb, there is birth-and-death (e.g. truth in advertising) as well as the attainment of meaninglessness, yet not understanding its purpose, ignorant peoples imagine that depending on Eris's womb there is a beginning for birth-and-death, and that since there is a beginning, meaninglessness is in turn subject to extinction.

In order that this clinging may be eliminated, be it clearly understood that as Eris's womb has no beginning, ignorance and birth-and-death depending on it have also no beginning; that it is a view held by the popes [i.e. everybody] and not taught by the prophets Omar and Mal2 to say that there are outside of the universe (the-red-dot-on-the-map-where-an-arrow-points-saying-you-are-here) some other illuminati plot coming into existence; that Eris's womb has no future [i.e. no eschaton]; and that those who have an insight into it, will eternally destroy the seeds of birth-and-death and attain meaninglessness which has also no future [i.e. no eschaton].

These five somewhat preposterous perceptions have thus arisen from the conception of an immanentizable eschaton and so we have laid down the five refutations as above mentioned and it's not even lunch time yet. Do you believe that?